Visualization Books: Incomplete

The Economist looks at a number of information and data visualization books.  What they look at is good, but is very incomplete.  Largely based on infographics, and does not include the ability to interact with changing data.   When I see something that is called an 'infographic' or is clearly that, it screams to me that it is both incomplete and static.  Thus fundamentally wrong.   Lots new is out there today.  Worth a scan.