In several projects I discovered that otherwise technical executives did not know what Github was. Might imply they would be nervous that MSFT was getting the ability to control code in new ways? How might this be leveraged to other recent resource-rich asset acquisitions, like Linkedin?
(Update) Why Microsoft Is Willing to Pay So Much for GitHub?
By Paul V. Weinstein .... "
(Update) How about issues with controversial code? In Wired.
Microsoft confirms it’s acquiring GitHub for $7.5 billion By Tom Warren @tomwarren in TheVerge
Microsoft is acquiring GitHub. After reports emerged that the software giant was in talks to acquire GitHub, Microsoft is making it official today. This is Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella’s second big acquisition, following the $26.2 billion acquisition of LinkedIn two years ago. GitHub was last valued at $2 billion back in 2015, and Microsoft is paying $7.5 billion in stock for the company in a deal that should close later this year.
GitHub is a large code repository that has become very popular with developers and companies hosting entire projects, documentation, and code. Apple, Amazon, Google, and many other big tech companies use GitHub. There are 85 million repositories hosted on GitHub, and 28 million developers contribute to them. GitHub will now be led by CEO Nat Friedman, the founder of Xamarin, who will report to Microsoft’s Cloud and AI chief Scott Guthrie. GitHub CEO and co-founder Chris Wanstrath will now become a technical fellow at Microsoft, also reporting into Guthrie. ... "
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment