In the April 7, 08 Businessweek: Busting a Rogue Blogger. About a person blogging anonymously on the 'Troll Tracker' blog, which followed patent trolls, and who turned out to be a Cisco patent attorney. As someone who has blogged both in and outside of a large company for years, this provided some useful insight into the dilemmas of separating the origins of opinions effectively. I had never read the 'troll trackers' blog, but the article says it was opinionated but largely innocuous.
Then there is always the problem of comments. Commenters' opinions can be much more volatile than the bloggers own. Bloggers love comments, because it is proof of engagement with their audience. So there is a tendency to allow more license to commenters than might have given yourself, to indicate your openness to other opinions. It was unclear how closely the comments were moderated. In this case comments included charges of acts that were felonies and even an implied death threat.
This case has ended up in defamation lawsuits against the blogger and Cisco. Including Cisco in the lawsuit shows how relatively little the 'my opinions are my own' disclaimer in blogs like this one mean. Also though Cisco was not involved in their employee's blogging, they do have an official public blog, where they recently included a post that updated their employee blogging policy, worth a read.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
One can no longer read the patent troll tracker blog. There were a lot more issues in this than mentioned in the post, including Cisco's Chandler referencing the blog as an "independent" source. Further, Frenkel's superior Yen knew of the blog, so one wonders how much gaming was going on.
Of the death threats, etc., one can view "The Cowardice of Anonymous Bloggers" by Joe Hosteny in the March 2008 issue of Intellectual Property Today. [Hosteny is a law partner of Niro, a frequent target of troll tracker.]
I did read the blog, which was a source of information. However, I would not characterize its one-sided depictions as "innocuous."
Lawrence B. Ebert
blog at IPBiz.blogspot
Post a Comment